Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone) )

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


January 14, 2011

IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) )
MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge:

ORDER

This Document Relates to:

Rebecca Cashion v. Bayer Corp. et al.

No. 3:10-cv-10234-DRH-PMF

Nadine Checchia v. Bayer Corp. et al.

No. 3:10-cv-10081-DRH-PMF

Cheryl Dixon v. Bayer HealthCare Pharms. Inc. et al.

No. 3:10-cv-10411-DRHPMF

Nicole Lewis v. Bayer Corp. et al.

No. 3:10-cv-10906-DRH-PMF

Staci Monk v. Bayer Corp. et al.

No. 3:10-cv-20285-DRH-PMF

Gina Salazar v. Bayer Corp. et al.

No. 3:10-cv-10678-DRH-PMF

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s ("Bayer") motion, pursuant to Case Management Order 12 ("CMO 12"), for an Order dismissing Plaintiffs' claims in the above-captioned matters without prejudice for failure to comply with their Plaintiff Fact Sheet ("PFS") obligations.*fn1 Bayer contends that the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned matters have not served Bayer with a completed PFS and have not served Bayer with the disclosures and authorizations required by CMO 12.

Under Section E of CMO 12, Plaintiffs were given 14 days from the date of Defendant's motion, in this case 14 days from December 22, 2010, to file a response either certifying that they served upon Defendants and Defendants received a completed PFS, and attaching appropriate documentation of receipt or an opposition to Defendant's motion.

To date, none of the Plaintiffs in the above-captioned member actions has filed a response to Bayer's motion to dismiss pursuant to CMO 12. Because Plaintiffs have failed to respond, in any way, to Bayer's allegations, the Court finds that Plaintiffs in the above-captioned member actions have failed to comply with the requirements of CMO 12.

Accordingly, the Court hereby Orders as follows: The above-captioned member actions are dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the requirements of CMO 12.

Further, the Court reminds Plaintiffs that, pursuant to CMO 12 Section E, unless Plaintiffs serve Defendants with a completed PFS or move to vacate the dismissal without prejudice within 60 days after entry of this Order, the Order will be converted to a Dismissal With Prejudice upon Defendants' motion.

SO ORDERED

David R. Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court

2011.01.14 09:56:07 -06'00'


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.