Name of Assigned Judge Virginia M. Kendall Sitting Judge if Other or Magistrate Judge than Assigned Judge
CASE TITLE DOCKET ENTRY TEXT
The Court concludes that Case No. 10 C 7746 is a continuation of Case No. 07 C 4635. The Clerk is instructed to file the documents from Case No. 10 C 7746 in Case No. 07 C 4635 and close Case No. 10 C 7746. The parties are instructed to use Case No. 07 C 4635 for all future filings. The Attorney General of Illinois is dismissed as a respondent. Warden Keith Anglin of the Danville Correctional Center is substituted as respondent in place of Warden Lee Ryker. Each party is ordered to provide a status report detailing the present status of petitioner's state court proceedings by no later than January 25, 2011. Responses to the opposing parties' status report are due by no later than February 15, 2011. The Court will rule by mail and set additional dates in that ruling. Respondent should not answer or otherwise respond to the petition at this time.
O[ For further details see text below.] Docketing to mail notices.
Pending before the Court is petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus brought pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Dkt. No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, this Court instructs petitioner to clarify whether he wishes to proceed on his present petition at this time. Respondent is also instructed to file a status report detailing petitioner's state court proceedings.
In 1999, petitioner was convicted of murder and sentenced to fifty years of imprisonment. Illinois v. Vann, No. 97 CR 08756-02 (Circuit Court of Cook County). (Dkt. No. 1 at 3). He states that his direct appeal to the Appellate Court of Illinois, First District was denied on March 6, 2001. Illinois v. Vann, No. 1-99-3953 (Ill. App. Ct. Mar. 6, 2001). (Dkt. No. 1 at 5). There is no record of a petition for leave to appeal (PLA) to the Supreme Court of Illinois in Westlaw, and petitioner states that he did not bring a PLA. (Id. at 6).
Petitioner states that he filed a post-conviction petition in the Circuit Court of Cook County on January 29, 2002. (Id. at 6). The petition was denied, and this was affirmed by the First District. Illinois v. Vann, No. 1-04-2766 (Ill. App. Ct. Feb. 21, 2006). (Dkt. No. 1 at 7, 31). Petitioner brought a PLA, which was denied on September 27, 2006. Illinois v. Vann, 857 N.E.2d 683 (Ill. Sept. 27, 2006) (Table). Petitioner states that on June 22, 2006, he brought a petition for relief from his judgment pursuant to 735 ILCS 5/2-1401 in the Circuit Court of Cook County. (Dkt. No.1 at 7). The Section 2-1401 petition was allegedly pending when petitioner brought his present habeas corpus petition.
On July 31, 2007, petitioner brought a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 challenging the 1999 Circuit Court of Cook County murder conviction in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. Van v. Ryker, No. 07 C 546 (S.D. Ill.) (Regan, J). Petitioner was incarcerated the Lawrence Correctional Center in Sumner, Illinois when he submitted the petition in 2007. On August 3, 2007, Judge Regan noted that petitioner was challenging a conviction that occurred in the Northern District of Illinois and transferred the petition to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404. No. 07 C 546, Dkt. No. 4.
On August 29, 2007, this Court summarily dismissed the petition without prejudice due to petitioner's failure to exhaust his available state court remedies. Vann v. Ryker, No. 07 C 4635 (N.D. Ill.) (Kendall, J.) (Dkt. No. 8). The Court's August 29th order noted petitioner's mention of the pending Section 2-1401 petition. It concluded that it could not determine whether this was a "proper[ly] filed application for state post-conviction or other collateral review" that would toll the one-year statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d). (Id.). Thus, the Court effectively stayed these proceedings by dismissing the habeas petition with leave to reinstate within 30 days of the completion of petitioner's state court proceedings. (Id. (citing Arrieta v. Battaglia, 461 F.3d 861, 863 (7th Cir. 2006)). The Court also instructed that petitioner should move to reinstate his petition upon the completion of his state court proceedings. (Id.). Petitioner was warned that failure to do so within 30 days of the completion of his state proceedings would result in the 2007 dismissal becoming a final order on the next court day. (Id.).
On December 6, 2010, this Court received the present habeas corpus petition from petitioner. Vann v. Anglin, No. 10 C 7746 (Kendall, J). (Dkt. No. 1). The docket states that his envelope is postmarked December 1, 2010. (Id.). He also provided a letter to the Court stating that his Section 2-1401 petition proceedings were completed on November 4, 2010, and asks for leave to proceed with his present petition. (Dkt. No. 3). However, his present petition states that he has an appeal presently pending in his Section 2-1401 proceedings. (Dkt. No. 1 at 8).
Upon reviewing the record in this case, the Court reaches the following determinations:
First, Vann v. Anglin, No. 10 C 7746 (N.D. Ill.) is a continuation of Vann v. Ryker, No. 07 C 4635 (N.D. Ill.). Petitioner's petition and associated statement regarding the status of his Section 2-1401 proceedings received by the Court on December 6, 2010 should have been filed in Case No. 07 C 4635. The Clerk is therefore instructed to file the documents from Case No. 10 C 7746 in Case No. 07 C 4635. This case shall continue under Case No. 07 C 4635 ...