Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States of America, Ex Rel., Marsha Turner and Carolyn v. Michaelis Jackson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


December 3, 2010

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL., MARSHA TURNER AND CAROLYN SWARTOS, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
MICHAELIS JACKSON & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C., AN ILLINOIS LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY DOING BUSINESS AS JACKSON VISION & LASER CENTERS, L.L.C., AND MICHAELIS BILLY JACKSON, M.D., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants' Motion for Leave to File a Sur-Reply Brief (Doc. 165). Specifically, Defendants seek to file a sur-reply in the briefing of Plaintiffs' Motion to Admit (Doc. 133).

The Local Rules are clear regarding the submission of sur-replies: "[u]nder no circumstances will sur-reply briefs be accepted." S.D. Ill. L. R. 7.1(g). This absolute rule provides for no exception. Even if the Court were to carve out an exception for Defendants, the instant motion is surely untimely, as the Reply (Doc. 151) to which Defendants seek to respond was filed almost two months ago.

Being fully advised of the premises, the Court DENIES the instant motion (Doc. 165). IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/ J. Phil Gilbert

20101203

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.