Searching over 5,500,000 cases.

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hester v. United States

November 19, 2010


The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge David H. Coar


Plaintiff Ivy Hester brings this action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act ("FTCA"), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680, alleging negligent and intentional infliction of emotional distress (Counts I and II) and negligent supervision (Count III). The Government moves for summary judgment on all claims. For the reasons stated below, the Government's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.


Plaintiff Ivy Hester brings this action against the United States seeking to hold it vicariously liable for the alleged acts or omissions of former United States postal worker John Swietek and his supervisors at the Postal Service facility in Mt. Prospect, Illinois. (Defendant's Rule 56.1 Statement of Material Facts ("DSOF") ¶ 4.) The following facts are drawn entirely from the Government's Rule 56.1 statement of material facts. Because Hester neither responded to the Government's statement of facts nor submitted a separate statement of additional facts, the Government's facts are deemed admitted. See Local Rule 56.1(b).

The Accident

Hester, who has been employed as a truck driver for the past seven years, was driving his truck westbound on W. Golf Road in Mt. Prospect on the morning of August 8, 2007. (DSOF ¶¶ 3, 5.) As Hester neared the intersection of W. Golf Road and We Go Trail, Swietek attempted to commit suicide by stepping in front of Hester's moving truck. (Id. at ¶ 6.) When Hester saw Swietek, he swerved his truck but was unable to avoid contact. (Id. at ¶ 7.) The right bumper of Hester's truck struck Swietek, causing Swietek to suffer a leg fracture and abrasions. (Id.)

In his deposition, Hester was presented with a picture of the intersection between W. Golf Road and We Go Trail and was asked to mark the location where his truck first made contact with Swietek. (Id. at ¶ 8.) In response, Hester marked an "X" on the westbound lanes of W. Golf Road slightly to the east of the northeast corner of W. Golf Road and We Go Trail. (Id.)When police and medical personnel arrived at the scene of the accident, Hester told police what had happened, and Swietek admitted that he had stepped in front of Hester's oncoming truck. (Id. at ¶ 9.) Swietek was then taken to the hospital for treatment of his injuries. (Id.)

In the aftermath of the accident, several other postal employees arrived at the scene. (Id. at ¶ 10.) The first to arrive was Kenneth Labbé, who had been delivering mail on W. Golf Road when he happened to see Hester's truck stopped in the middle of the street. (Id.) When Labbé saw a postal service hat and mail bag at the scene, he reported the accident to the Mt. Prospect post office, and two supervisors (Chaeyeun Sa and James Carlson) came to investigate. (Id.) After visiting the scene, Sa prepared an accident report dated August 8, 2007. (Id. at ¶ 11.) The report noted, among other things, that Swietek's last delivery was made at 923 S. We Go Trail, that W. Golf Road was not within Swietek's delivery territory, and that Swietek was outside the "line of travel" for his route when he stepped in front of Hester's truck on W. Golf Road. (Id.)

Approximately two weeks after the accident, on August 23, 2007, Labbé prepared a written statement documenting his observations during the aftermath of the accident and an incident that occurred two days prior to the accident, on August 6. (Id. at ¶ 12.) In his statement, Labbé wrote that he saw Swietek behaving in an "unusual" way on August 6. (Id.) According to Labbé, Swietek was standing on the corner of W. Golf Road and We Go Trail and staring eastward toward oncoming traffic on W. Golf Road for two to four minutes, as if he were waiting for a bus. (Id.) This was peculiar, Labbé explained, because Swietek's delivery route gave him no cause to come within 20 feet of W. Golf Road and instead required him to cross over We Go Trail in a westbound direction. (Id.) As an attachment to his written statement, Labbé provided a map showing that the normal path for Swietek's route went up and down We Go Trail, but did not require him to come into contact with W. Golf Road. (Id. at ¶ 13.)

Labbé also explained in his statement that, after he saw Swietek stare down W. Golf Road on August 6, he contacted Sharon Williams, the postmaster at the Mt. Prospect post office, and suggested that she perform a street observation of Swietek. (Id.) In her deposition, Williams confirmed that she received a call about Swietek's behavior on August 6. (Id. at ¶ 14.) As a result, Williams and another supervisor went out to check on Swietek and found him back on his route delivering mail. (Id.) When Williams asked if he was okay that day, Swietek said that he was fine. (Id.)

Swietek's Worker's Compensation Claim

On August 21, 2007, Swietek submitted a claim to the U.S. Department of Labor seeking compensation for his injuries on August 8, 2007 under the Federal Employees Compensation Act ("FECA"). (DSOF ¶ 15.) On August 24, 2007, the Postal Service submitted a letter to the Department of Labor challenging Sweitek's request for FECA benefits. (Id. at ¶ 16.) The Postal Service's letter stated that Swietek had deviated from his route, and that Swietek's injuries had resulted from his own intent to hurt himself rather than from any employment factors. (Id.) The letter also explained that Labbé had reported "unusual" behavior by Swietek two days before the accident, causing the postal management to check on Swietek. (Id.) The letter further reported that when the postal management checked on Swietek, they found him back on his route delivering mail, and Swietek told Postmaster Williams that everything was fine. (Id.) Finally, the Postal Service's letter noted that Swietek was undergoing treatment for personal stressors with anti-depression medication and had filed a previous claim for a psychological condition, which was denied by the Department of Labor eight years earlier in 1999. (Id.)

In a decision dated October 7, 2007, the Department of Labor notified Swietek that he was not entitled to compensation for his injuries under FECA because they did not arise out of, and in the ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.