Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Connally v. Walgreen Co.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


November 15, 2010

PAMELA CONNALLY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
WALGREEN CO., AN ILLINOIS CORPORATION DOING BUSINESS AS WALGREEN'S DISTRIBUTION CENTER, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on its own initiative for purposes of case management. Specifically, the Court is concerned with Plaintiff Pamela Connally's failure to respond to Defendant Walgreen Co.'s ("Walgreen") Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 15) and Memorandum in Support Thereof (Doc. 16).

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), Connally's response was due thirty days after said motion was served, but thirty days have passed and Connally has not responded. The Court may, in its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of the motion. S.D. Ill. L. R. 7.1(c).

Being fully advised of the premises, the Court hereby ORDERS Connally to SHOW CAUSE on or before December 3, 2010, why the Court should not construe her failure to timely respond to Walgreen's motion as an admission of its merits and grant the relief sought accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101115

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.