Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sydner v. Marks

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


November 2, 2010

EARL E. SYDNER, JR. , PLAINTIFF,
v.
DEPUTY MARKS, DEPUTY SERGEANT VAUGHN, AND JOHN DOES 2, 3, 4, 5 & 6, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff's First Supplemental Request for Production of Documents. (Doc. 43).

Defendants responded to the motion at Doc. 44. The Court construes defendants' response as a request to extend the time for filing objections to the First Supplemental Requests. The Court finds that defendants' failure to timely object to the First Supplemental Requests was the result of excusable neglect, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(b)(1)(B). The time to object to plaintiff's First Supplemental Request for Production of Documents is extended to September 17, 2010, the date on which defendants filed their response to the motion and the attached objections. The Court deems the objections attached to Doc. 44 to be timely.

Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion to Compel Defendants' Responses to Plaintiff's First Supplemental Request for Production of Documents (Doc. 43) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20101102

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.