Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Antoine v. Ramos

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


November 2, 2010

NATHAN ANTOINE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANTHONY RAMOS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge

ORDER

Now before the Court is Defendants' motion for enlargement of time (Doc. 85). Defendants move the Court for an extension of time to file a reply to Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Court DENIES the motion. Local Rule 7.1(c) provides in part: "Reply briefs are not favored and should be filed only in exceptional circumstances. The party filing the reply brief should state the exceptional circumstances." Here, Defendants have not stated the exceptional circumstances warranting a reply brief. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants' motion for enlargement of time (Doc. 85).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101102

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.