Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Antoine v. Ramos

November 2, 2010

NATHAN ANTOINE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ANTHONY RAMOS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge

ORDER

Now before the Court is Defendants' motion for enlargement of time (Doc. 85). Defendants move the Court for an extension of time to file a reply to Plaintiff's response to Defendants' motion for summary judgment. The Court DENIES the motion. Local Rule 7.1(c) provides in part: "Reply briefs are not favored and should be filed only in exceptional circumstances. The party filing the reply brief should state the exceptional circumstances." Here, Defendants have not stated the exceptional circumstances warranting a reply brief. Accordingly, the Court DENIES Defendants' motion for enlargement of time (Doc. 85).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20101102

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.