Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Titus v. Hulick

October 20, 2010

RICHARD G. TITUS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
DONALD HULICK, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is the defendants' motion to compel plaintiff to respond to their interrogatories and requests for production propounded on or about June 29, 2010. (Doc. 70.) Defendants' discovery requests are aimed at information and documentation of plaintiff's efforts to exhaust administrative remedies. Plaintiff has not responded to the subject motion, but the Court observes that the previous Magistrate Judge assigned to this case held a hearing regarding the exhaustion issue, and that issue has been decided by U.S. District Judge Michael J. Reagan. Thus, this Court perceives that the issue is likely moot.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that, for good cause shown, the defendants' motion to compel (Doc. 70) is GRANTED. If plaintiff has not already done so, on or before November 1, 2010, plaintiff shall respond to the defendants' interrogatories and requests for production.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20101020

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.