IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
October 8, 2010
JESSIE D. CRAIG, PLAINTIFF,
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Reagan, District Judge
Plaintiff Jessie Craig filed a complaint in this Court on August 28, 2009 (Doc. 2), seeking review through 42 U.S.C. § 405 of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security. The Commissioner's decision denied her applications for social security benefits which she made in January 2005. After the parties briefed the case, Magistrate Judge Philip M. Frazier submitted a report which recommended that the decision of the Commissioner be reversed and remanded for a new decision consistent with the report. (Doc. 22.)
If a party objects to a magistrate judge's report and recommendation within 14 days of the service of the report, the Court must review de novo the objected portions of the report. 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1) (West Supp. 2010); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); S.D. Ill. R. 73.1(b); Govas v. Chalmers, 965 F.2d 298, 301 (7th Cir. 1992). No one has filed any objection to the report, and 14 days have long since elapsed. Without timely objections, the Court only needs to conduct a review of the report for clear error. Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999) (citing Goffman v. Gross, 59 F.3d 668, 671 (7th Cir. 1995); Campbell v. U.S. Dist. Court, 501 F.2d 196, 206 (9th Cir. 1974)). The Court has reviewed the report and found it free of clear error.
Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS Judge Frazier's report in its entirety (Doc. 22), REVERSES the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security and REMANDS the case for further proceedings consistent with the report.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL J. REAGAN United States District Judge
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.