IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
October 4, 2010
LISA F. WALLACE, ETC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
DEBORRAH LINDI LEITCH, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
This District Court's random assignment system has brought to this Court's calendar a sprawling and disjointed handwritten Complaint (coupled with bulky exhibits) that plainly has no business in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois*fn1 --a pleading that could be a poster child for the concept of frivolousness in the legal sense defined by Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) and Denton v. Hernandez, 504 U.S. 25, 32-33 (1992), even apart from the fact that Complaint ¶5 states (unsurprisingly, given n.1) that all defendants reside in Tulsa County, Oklahoma. In this Circuit any plaintiff who seeks in forma pauperis status must not only make a showing of financial inability to pay the filing fee but a non-frivolous claim for relief as well.
Accordingly this Court dismisses both the Complaint and this action sua sponte because the Dkt. 4 document that has accompanied the Complaint has shown an inability to pay any filing fee. In that respect, this Court informs plaintiffs that (1) if they were inclined to file another such lawsuit and were somehow able to pay the $350 filing fee, this District Court's local rules would call for direct assignment of that case to this Court's calendar and (2) in this Court's view the likelihood of the case's survival would also be highly remote, so that payment of that costly fee could be a waste of money.