Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Porter v. Trancoso

October 1, 2010

LATASHIA PORTER, PETITIONER,
v.
CAROLYN TRANCOSO, RESPONDENT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge

STATEMENT AS TO CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

Latashia Porter ("Porter") has filed a notice of appeal from this Court's August 31, 2010 memorandum opinion and order ("Opinion") that denied Porter's 28 U.S.C. §2254*fn1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition") and dismissed both the Petition and this action. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b) requires this Court either to issue a certificate of appealability or to state the reasons why such a certificate should not issue.

As this Court's Opinion held, the Illinois Appellate Court complied meticulously with the requirements of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984) by its detailed analysis demonstrating that Porter had not shown she was prejudiced by the mistakes made by her trial counsel. That determination met directly the standard set out in Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 (quoted by the Appellate Court) that there was "no reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different."

That being the case, Porter did not bring herself within either Section 2254(d)(1) or Section 2254(d)(2). Accordingly Porter failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right (see Section 2253(c)(2)), and this Court ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.