Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In re Yasmin and Yaz Marketing

August 27, 2010

IN RE YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND RELEVANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO:
PAMELA HAMILTON
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20051-DRH-PMF)
CLAIRE KEULTJES
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20012-DRH-PMF)
MARLENE MEADOWS
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20009-DRH-PMF)
VALERIE KOZAK
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20024-DRH-PMF)
APRIL DYMACEK
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20047-DRH-PMF)
SUSAN HARGRAVE
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20074-DRH-PMF)
RHONDA BAGLEY
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20121-DRH-PMF)
ANNE MARIE EAKINS
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20010-DRH-PMF)
LAUREN MURPHY
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20011-DRH-PMF)
MARIE BECKER
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20032-DRH-PMF)
ALYSSA STELLMAKER
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20056-DRH-PMF)
ALAINA KLARQUIST
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20056-DRH-PMF)
KIMBERLY KIRK
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20061-DRH-PMF)
WENDY GUTE
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20064-DRH-PMF)
AMY CLAY
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20073-DRH-PMF)
JENNIFER ENGHOLM
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20080-DRH-PMF)
LINDSEY SCHACHERL
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20093-DRH-PMF)
ADRIANNA CORNELL PINTO
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20094-DRH-PMF)
RAUNDA SMITH
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20095-DRH-PMF)
SARAH MANSOUR
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20143-DRH-PMF)
KELLY HAYNAM
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20167-DRH-PMF)
MARIE STEPHENSON
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20168-DRH-PMF)
CYNTHIA HALE
v.
BAYER CORP., ET AL. (3:09-CV-20021-DRH-PMF)



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Judge David R. Herndon

MDL No. 2100

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs' unopposed motions for leave to amend their complaints to add Bayer Schering Pharma AG as a named defendant. Upon consideration of Plaintiffs' motions the Court finds as follows:

Plaintiffs' motions for leave to amend for the purpose of adding Bayer Schering Pharma AG as a named defendant are GRANTED. Further, as requested, the Court will allow Plaintiffs 14 days from the granting of this motion to amend their complaints in accordance with the method set forth in Case Management Order # 17.

SO ORDERED:

David R Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court

20100827

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.