Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co. v. Ferando

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


August 17, 2010

GRINNELL MUTUAL REINSURANCE COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JAMES FERANDO, KEVIN MCCOY, AND CHAD MCCOY, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court are Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Against Defendant James Ferando (Doc. 32) and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Against Defendants Chad and Kevin McCoy (Doc. 33).

Defendant Ferando has not responded to the motion, and the time for doing so has expired. The Court deems the failure to respond to be an admission of the merits of the motion. SDIL-LR 7.1.

Defendants Chad McCoy and Kevin McCoy filed a response to Doc. 33 at Doc. 38.*fn1

They represent that they mailed their responses to plaintiff's interrogatories and requests for production on July 23, 2010, rendering the motion to compel moot.

For good cause shown, Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Against Defendant James Ferando (Doc. 32) is GRANTED. Defendant Ferando shall fully respond to plaintiff's discovery requests by August 23, 2010.

Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Against Defendants Chad and Kevin McCoy (Doc. 33) is DENIED as moot.

Plaintiff's Motion for Oral Argument, incorrectly docketed as a "notice" at Doc. 39, is also DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.