IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
August 5, 2010
CLARK A. WREN, PETITIONER,
FAYETTE COUNTY JAIL, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Reagan, District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Petitioner broughts this pro se habeas corpus action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 to challenge his 2007 conviction in state court (St. Clair County, Illinois) for possession of a controlled substance for which he appears to have been placed on probation for 24 months. At the time he filed the instant action, Petitioner was being held pending resolution of federal criminal charges. See United States v. Wren, Case No. 3:09-cv-30035 (S.D. Ill.). Petitioner contended that the earlier state conviction was being used against him in the federal criminal case.
After reviewing the habeas petition, this Court found that Petitioner was not entitled to relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. See (Doc. 4). However, the Court informed Petitioner that it could re-characterize the instant action as Petitioner's first habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Id. Before re-characterizing the instant § 2241 action as one under § 2254, the Court first gave Petitioner notice that any subsequent § 2254 action may be subjected to the restrictive conditions imposed by federal law on "second or successive" § 2254 petitions, 28 U.S.C. § 2244(3)(a), and provided Petitioner an opportunity to withdraw or amend his pleading. Id.; Castro v. United States, 540 U.S. 375, 377 (2003). Petitioner has informed the Court that he wishes to withdraw his habeas petition (Doc. 5).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus is voluntarily DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. All pending motions are DENIED as moot. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED TO CLOSE THIS CASE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL J. REAGAN United States District Judge
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.