Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Custom Blending and Packaging of St. Louis, LLC v. Moser

August 4, 2010

CUSTOM BLENDING AND PACKAGING OF ST. LOUIS, LLC, PLAINTIFF,
v.
STEVEN MOSER, JR., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court for case management. On August 3, 2010, Defendants DAC Industries, Inc., DAC Aerosol & Liquid Fill, Inc., and Litz filed a reply to Plaintiff's response to their motion for summary judgment (Doc. 105).

Local Rule 7.1 (c) states in part:

Reply briefs are not favored and should be filed only in exceptional circumstances. The party filing the reply brief shall state the exceptional circumstances.

Here, Defendants' reply brief does not state the exceptional circumstances as to why a reply brief is needed. Further, the reply violates Local Rule 7.1(c) in that it is seven pages.*fn1 Thus, the Court STRIKES the reply.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David R. Herndon Chief Judge United States ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.