IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
July 20, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF,
CODY GRANTHAM, DEFENDANT,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Stiehl, District Judge
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
On March 22, 2010, the United States of America and defendant Cody Grantham consented to appear before Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and SDIL Rule 72.1(b)(2). At that time, the defendant entered a plea of guilty to Counts 1, 2, 3, and 4 of the Indictment.
On March 22, 2010, Judge Proud submitted a Report recommending that the undersigned District Judge accept the plea of guilty on Count 1 of the Indictment, that a pre-sentence investigation and report be prepared, and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly (Doc. 27).
The Report was sent to the parties along with a "NOTICE" informing them of their right to appeal by way of filing "Objections" within ten days of service of the Report and Recommendation. Neither party has filed an objection, therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court need not conduct de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985); Video Views Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).
Accordingly, the undersigned District Judge ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Proud's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 27), ACCEPTS defendant Cody Grantham's plea of guilty to Count 1, and ADJUDGES defendant Cody Grantham guilty on Count 1 of the Indictment.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
WILLIAM D. STIEHL District Judge
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.