IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
July 8, 2010
STEVENSON CRANE SERVICE, INC., ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
CHRISTINE PITTS, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge
This Court has received the courtesy copy of the Answer just filed by Christine Pitts ("Pitts") in response to the Complaint brought against her by Stevenson Crane Service, Inc. and Donna Stevenson (collectively "Stevensons"). This sua sponte memorandum addresses only a single aspect of that responsive pleading, and no inference should be drawn from that limited focus as to the propriety or adequacy of the Answer in any other respect.
In light of the nature of Stevensons' allegations against Pitts, it is unsurprising that her response is chock-full of invocations of her Fifth Amendment right to remain silent. That being so, both Pitts and Stevensons should be aware that such invocation, although creating no substantive detriment in any criminal proceedings, has important potential effects on the pursuit of this litigation. Under Baxter v. Palmigiano, 425 U.S. 308 (1976) a negative inference may be drawn against Pitts by reason of her Fifth Amendment assertions--see, in addition to Baxter itself, such cases as Evans v. City of Chicago, 513 F.3d 735, 740-41 (7th Cir. 2008).
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.