IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
June 29, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
BILL L. WILMOTH, III, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge
MEMORANDUM and ORDER
Now before the Court is Wilmoth's motion and affidavit to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 43). Based on the following, the Court denies as moot the motion to proceed in forma pauperis.
The Court finds the motion to proceed in forma pauperis moot. Wilmoth does not need the Court's permission to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in his criminal case as the Court determined at the trial level that he was financially unable to obtain adequate defense, see Doc. 8, although he eventually did retain private counsel. "A party ... who was determined to be financially unable to obtain an adequate defense in a criminal case ... may proceed on appeal without further authorization" unless the district court certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith, finds that the party is not entitled or a statute provides otherwise. FED.R.APP.P 24(a)(3). The Court has not and will not certify that Wilmoth should not be allowed to continue as a pauper and no statute forbids it. Therefore, Wilmoth already has the authority he needs. Thus, the Court DENIES as moot the motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 43).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
David R Her|do| Chief Judge United States District Court
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.