Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Riddle v. Faw

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS, PEORIA DIVISION


June 17, 2010

DEMARCUS C. RIDDLE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CITY OF PEORIA POLICE OFFICER FAW, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Byron G. Cudmore, U.S. Magistrate Judge

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On April 27, 2010, pro se Plaintiff filed his Complaint herein requesting to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's request to proceed in forma pauperis was denied by the Court by text order of May 6, 2010 setting a deadline of June 10, 2010 for payment of the filing fee in full. The text order of May 6, 2010 advised if timely payment was not received, the case was subject to dismissal for want of prosecution. As of this date, pro se Plaintiff has failed to comply with payment in proper form of the $350.00 filing fee. The Court recommends that pro se Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed for want of prosecution.

Plaintiff is advised that any objection to this Report and Recommendation must be filed in writing with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen days after being served with a copy of this Report and Recommendation. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Failure to file a timely objection will constitute a waiver of objections on appeal. Video Views, Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538, 539 (7th Cir. 1986). See Local Rule 72.2.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to send a copy of this Report and Recommendation to pro se Plaintiff at his last known address.

BYRON G. CUDMORE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20100617

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.