Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Davis v. Williams

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


June 9, 2010

DARNELL DAVIS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LT. WILLIAMS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendations ("R&R") issued pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) by United States Magistrate Judge Frazier (Doc. 34). The R & R's conclusion, based on the Magistrate Judge's review of the record and the applicable law, is that Plaintiff has properly exhausted his administrative remedies and that the Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment, based upon the issue of administrative exhaustion, (Doc. 24) should therefore be denied.

The R&R was sent to the Parties with a notice informing them of their right to appeal by way of filing "objections" within fourteen days of service. The time period in which to file an objection has lapsed. None of the Parties have filed any objection. Therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) this Court need not conduct a de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985). Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the R&R (Doc. 34) in its entirety and DENIES Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 24).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

DavidRHer|do| Chief Judge United States District Court

20100609

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.