Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Hollis v. Singh

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


June 4, 2010

MAX RUSSELL HOLLIS, JR., PLAINTIFF,
v.
KULWANT SINGH AND SAHOTA BROTHERS, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Defendant Sahota Brothers' April 29, 2010 motion to dismiss (Doc. 4). Specifically, Sahota Brothers maintains that the complaint against it must be dismissed as it is legally nonexistent and cannot be sued. Shahota Brothers contends that it is nothing more than a business name; that it is not incorporated nor is it any other type of business entity. As of this date, Hollis has not responded to the motion. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court finds that failure to respond to the motion to dismiss as an admission of the merits of the motion.*fn1 Thus, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Court DISMISSES with prejudice Sahota Brothers as a Defendant in this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Signed this 4th day of June, 2010.

David R Her|do| Chief Judge United States District Court


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.