IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
March 22, 2010
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF,
MICHAEL R. ROY, DEFENANT,
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Stiehl, District Judge
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
On November 9, 2009, the United States of America and defendant Michael R. Roy consented to appear before Magistrate Judge Clifford J. Proud pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 and SDIL Rule 72.1(b)(2). At that time, the defendant entered a plea of guilty to Count 1 of the Indictment.
On November 9, 2009, Judge Proud submitted a Report recommending that the undersigned District Judge accept the plea of guilty, that a presentence investigation and report be prepared, and that the Defendant be adjudicated guilty and have sentence imposed accordingly (Doc. 50).
The Report was sent to the parties along with a "NOTICE" informing them of their right to appeal by way of filing "Objections" within ten days of service of the Report and Recommendation. Neither party has filed an objection, therefore, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), this Court need not conduct de novo review. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149-52 (1985); Video Views Inc. v. Studio 21, Ltd., 797 F.2d 538 (7th Cir. 1986).
Accordingly, the undersigned District Judge ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Proud's Report and Recommendation (Doc. 50), ACCEPTS defendant Michael R. Roy's plea of guilty, and ADJUDGES defendant Michael R. Roy guilty.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
WILLIAM D. STIEHL District Judge
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.