IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
March 1, 2010
TROY D. WHITMORE, PLAINTIFF,
LIEUTENANT WALKER, LIEUTENANT WESTERMAN, LIEUTENANT FERRELL, C/O FRITZ, C/O MEZO, LIEUTENANT REES, SERGEANT CARTER, C/O HELMER, C/O HENRY, C/O MINER, C/O GREENLY, C/O PRESSWOOD, C/O ROBINSON, AND C/O WITTHOFT, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge
Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Re-Open Discovery. (Doc. 144). This motion is filed by plaintiff's appointed counsel, and it seeks to conditionally re-open discovery should the parties be unable to resolve defendants' objections to plaintiff's discovery requests.
The Court will not order that discovery be re-opened in general at this late date. Should there be a specific discovery issue that the parties are unable to resolve, plaintiff may file an appropriate motion directed to that specific issue.
Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion to Re-Open Discovery (Doc. 144) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.