Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Whitmore v. Walker

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


March 1, 2010

TROY D. WHITMORE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LIEUTENANT WALKER, LIEUTENANT WESTERMAN, LIEUTENANT FERRELL, C/O FRITZ, C/O MEZO, LIEUTENANT REES, SERGEANT CARTER, C/O HELMER, C/O HENRY, C/O MINER, C/O GREENLY, C/O PRESSWOOD, C/O ROBINSON, AND C/O WITTHOFT, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff's Motion to Re-Open Discovery. (Doc. 144). This motion is filed by plaintiff's appointed counsel, and it seeks to conditionally re-open discovery should the parties be unable to resolve defendants' objections to plaintiff's discovery requests.

The Court will not order that discovery be re-opened in general at this late date. Should there be a specific discovery issue that the parties are unable to resolve, plaintiff may file an appropriate motion directed to that specific issue.

Accordingly, plaintiff's Motion to Re-Open Discovery (Doc. 144) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20100301

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.