IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
February 26, 2010
JAMES A. AUFFENBERG, JR., MOVANT,
ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER, LLP, RESPONDENT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Murphy, District Judge
Respondent in this miscellaneous matter, Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP, is a law firm suing Movant, James A. Auffenberg, Jr., for unpaid attorney fees. That case is pending in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Movant has filed a counterclaim therein. The dispute involves the firm's representation of Movant in a criminal case that was tried in the Virgin Islands. Attorney J. William Lucco also was involved in Movant's criminal defense. Attorney Lucco is not affiliated with Respondent law firm.
On February 25, 2010, Movant filed, in this Court, "Motion by James A. Auffenberg, Jr., to Terminate or, in the Alternative, Limit the Scope of the Deposition of J. William Lucco until after March 16, 2010." According to the motion and exhibits thereto, a lawyer for Respondent firm issued a subpoena from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia for Attorney Lucco to appear for deposition within this district on February 25, 2010. Movant Auffenberg filed, in the District of Columbia, a motion to quash the Lucco subpoena and to stay the notice of deposition because (1) Auffenberg has made a demand for arbitration in that case and (2) the subpoena was improperly issued. Movant Auffenberg has filed other motions and/or objections relating to the deposition and other discovery disputes in the District of Columbia. Those matters are set for hearing in the District of Columbia on March 16, 2010. Attorney Lucco did not move to quash the subpoena for being improperly issued under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(a)(2) and, in fact, he appeared for the deposition as noticed.*fn1
This matter is not properly before this Court. Attorney Lucco submitted himself to the jurisdiction of the District of Columbia by appearing on the subpoena issued by that court. This Court lacks jurisdiction to act on Movant's request. Accordingly, the Motion filed by Movant Auffenberg on February 25, 2010, is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Consequently, this miscellaneous civil matter is CLOSED.
Movant shall serve a copy of this Order on Respondent law firm and on Attorney Lucco. The Clerk of Court is directed to modify the docket to reflect the proper posture of the parties to this proceeding, such that James A. Auffenberg, Jr., is the Movant, represented by Judy L. Cates, and Zuckerman Spaeder, LLP, is the Respondent. Respondent has not appeared in this matter; therefore, the docket should not reflect that it is proceeding pro se.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
G. PATRICK MURPHY United States District Judge