Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Farrar v. Receivable Management Service

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


February 5, 2010

JANA FARRAR, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT SERVICE, DEFENDANT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Jana Farrar's ("Farrar") Motion for Attorneys' Fees (Doc. 44).

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(g), Defendant Receivable Management Service's ("Receivable") response was due fourteen days after Farrar's motion was filed, but fourteen days have passed and Receivable has yet to respond. The Court may, in its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of the motion. S. D. Ill. R. 7.1(g). As such, the Court hereby ORDERS Receivable to SHOW CAUSE on or before February 26, 2010, why the Court should not construe its failure to timely respond to the instant motion as an admission of its merits and proceed accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20100205

© 1992-2010 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.