Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

In Re: Yasmin and Yaz (Drospirenone) Marketing

January 10, 2010

IN RE: YASMIN AND YAZ (DROSPIRENONE) MARKETING,
SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge:

ORDER

This Document Relates to:

Kelly Brockman v. McKesson Corp., et al.

No. 3:10-cv-20311-DRH-PMF

Karalyn Cardinale v. Bayer HealthCare Pharms., Inc., et al.

No. 3:10-cv-11617-DRH-PMF

Emily Mixon v. Bayer HealthCare Pharms., Inc., et al.

No. 3:10-cv-10715-DRH-PMF

Glenishe Rowe v. Bayer HealthCare Pharms., Inc., et al.

No. 3:10-cv-10718-DRH-PMF

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals Inc.'s ("Bayer") motion to show cause why Plaintiffs' claims should not be dismissed without prejudice. To date, Plaintiffs have not responded to Bayer's motion.

In each of the above captioned cases the Court granted a motion to withdraw filed by each Plaintiff's counsel (Brockman DOC. 16 (11/18/10);

Cardinale DOC. 11 (11/29/10); Mixon DOC. 7 (11/29/10); Rowe DOC. 9 (11/29/10)). Plaintiffs were required, pursuant to local rule 83.1(g)(2), to file a supplementary appearance within 21 days of the entry of the Order.1 To ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.