Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Pittman v. County of Madison

December 29, 2009

REGINALD PITTMAN, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND, ROBIN M. HAMILTON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COUNTY OF MADISON, STATE OF ILLINOIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
REGINALD PITTMAN, BY AND THROUGH HIS GUARDIAN AND NEXT FRIEND, ROBIN M. HAMILTON, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JEFFREY HARTOSE, AND LIEUTENANT RENEE STEPHENSON, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge

ORDER

Now before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to consolidate and amendment to motion for leave to file third amended complaint (Doc. 40).

Specifically, Plaintiff moves to consolidate this case with the recently filed Pittman v. Hartose, 09-1034-DRH. Plaintiff asserts that Defendants do not object to this motion. On December 23, 2009, Plaintiff, filed a Third Amended Complaint in cause 08-0890-DRH adding claims against Jeffrey Hartsoe and Lieutenant Renee Stephenson, the only named Defendants in 09-1034-DRH. A review of the Third Amended Complaint in 08-890-DRH and the Complaint in 09-1034-DRH, reveals that the claims against Hartsoe and Stephenson are the same. Clearly, consolidation is warranted. Thus, the Court GRANTS the motion. The Court CONSOLIDATES cause numbers 08-890-DRH and 09-1034-DRH. All further pleadings shall be filed in 08-0890-DRH.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

David R Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court

20091229

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.