Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Channel Bio Corp. v. Lewis

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


December 7, 2009

CHANNEL BIO CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ERIC LEWIS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff Channel Bio Corporation's ("Channel") Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. 121) directed at Defendant Eric Lewis.

Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), Lewis's response was due thirty days after Channel's motion was filed, but thirty days have passed and Lewis has yet to respond. The Court may, in its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of the motion. Local Rule 7.1(c). As such, the Court hereby ORDERS Lewis to SHOW CAUSE on or before January 4, 2010, why the Court should not construe his failure to timely respond to the motion for partial summary judgment as an admission of the merits of the motion and enter judgment accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20091207

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.