The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joan B. Gottschall United States District Judge
MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER
Defendant KPMG LLP moves for its costs after having prevailed against Plaintiff Andrew J. Maxwell, trustee of the bankrupt estate of MarchFirst, Inc. KPMG is entitled to its costs as the prevailing party and asks the court to tax $67,048.08 to Maxwell as trustee under Rule 54(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. There is a strong presumption that the prevailing party should be allowed to recover these costs, as permitted by statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1920; Weeks v. Samsung Heavy Indus., 126 F.3d. 926, 945 (7th Cir. 1997). However, the power to award costs is within the discretion of the district court, which evaluates the bill "to determine that expenses are allowable cost items, and that the amounts are reasonable and necessary." Deimer v. Cincinnati Sub-Zero Prods. Inc., 58 F.3d 341, 345 (7th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the court must find that the items in KPMG's bill are taxable.
A prevailing party may recover "fees of the clerk and marshal," pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1920(1). KPMG is seeking the $75.00 filing fee paid to the clerk. This item is taxable and unopposed. The court bills $75.00 to Maxwell.
The bulk of the expense in this bill, $49,995.94, reflects the cost of court reporters for deposition and transcripts, which are recoverable under 28 U.S.C. § 1920(2), but subject to the restrictions in Local Rule 54.1(b):
If in taxing costs the clerk finds that a transcript or deposition was necessarily obtained, the costs of the transcript or deposition shall not exceed the regular copy rate as established by the Judicial Conference of the United States and in effect at the time the transcript or deposition was filed unless some other rate was previously provided for by order of the court.
L.R. 54.1(b). In its bill of costs KPMG has made no effort to properly limit the cost of the transcripts and depositions as required by the local rule. The relevant depositions and transcripts were taken between April 4, 2004 and March 15, 2007 when the effective rates were $3.30 per page for an original and $0.83 per page for a copy. Maxwell objects and attaches the proper rates and the applicable rule along with a scheduled of the rates applied to defendant's costs. See Pl.'s Obj. to Def.'s Bill of Costs, Ex. A, B. Maxwell calculates the recoverable costs of transcripts to be $20,367.72.
Maxwell's calculations, though, do not conform with Local Rule 54.1 because Maxwell adds the court reporter's appearance fee, which far exceeds the allowable cost per page for a number of the depositions. Neither § 1920(2) nor Local Rule 54.1 provides for extra costs related to depositions. See Crawford Fitting Co. v. J.T. Gibbons, Inc., 482 U.S. 437, 441 (1987) (holding that § 1920 exhausts the definition of costs such that unenumerated expenses are not taxable under the statue).
The Judicial Administration and Technical Amendments Act of 2008 amended § 1920 to permit recovery of costs for electronically recorded transcripts. The electronic transcripts in this case, however, were extra copies. Extra copies of material counsel already possesses are not "necessarily obtained for use in this case." 28 U.S.C. § 1920(2); see EEOC v. Yellow Freight Sys., 98 C 2725, 1999 WL 965854 at *3 (N.D. Ill. Oct. 14, 1999) (delivery of an electronic copy with a paper copy constitutes a non-taxable extra copy). This does not prevent a party from obtaining an electronic transcript first and then publishing it in any format it finds convenient. However, reproducing a document in the party's possession would be billed correctly under § 1920(4): "fees for exemplification and the costs of making copies." Since KPMG has not shown why extra copies were necessary to its case, no extra copy will be billed to Maxwell.
The deposition invoices also included copy fees for adding exhibits to the record. These are taxable since their duplication in the record is necessary. The court accepts Maxwell's proposed rate of $0.13 per page as reasonable.
Maxwell's calculations for the taxable cost of the depositions are adopted, less the appearance fees, discussed supra, which exceed the maximum recoverable amount, but allowing for one DVD copy of Kurt Gabouer's deposition.*fn1 Maxwell is billed ...