Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Rozhon v. GTL Truck Lines

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION


September 24, 2009

CAROL ROZHON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS,
v.
GTL TRUCK LINES, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM

During this morning's motion call this Court granted the motion of GTL Truck Lines, Inc. to dismiss Count II of the Complaint in this action in reliance on the on-all-fours opinion in Gant v. L.U. Transp., Inc., 331 Ill.App.3d 924, 770 N.E.2d 1155 (1st Dist. 2002). This Court did so over the objection of plaintiffs' counsel, who argued that nearly two decades earlier the Illinois Supreme Court had assertedly held in Lockett v. BiState Transit Auth., 94 Ill.2d 66, 445 N.E.2d 310 (1983) that the still-earlier Appellate Court decision in Neff v. Davenport Packing Co., 131 Ill.App.2d 791, 268 N.E.2d 574 (3d Dist. 1971)--a decision on whose continued viability Gant relied--should not be read in an overly broad way. Although this Court had not then had the opportunity to read Lockett, it expressed grave doubt that the First District panel would have, by writing as it did in Gant, effectively thumbed its collective nose at controlling authority to the contrary emanating from the state's highest court.

This memorandum is issued to confirm that this Court's subsequent reading of Lockett has more than validated the doubt referred to in the preceding paragraph. Lockett did not at all cast any doubt on the propriety of the Neff holding--on the contrary, that case simply held that the conceptual analysis was necessarily different where the asserted misconduct of an employer was wilful and wanton entrustment rather than negligent entrustment (the latter being the nature of the claims common to Neff, Gant and this case). Accordingly this Court reconfirms its oral ruling that granted the motion to dismiss Complaint Count II.

20090924

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.