Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Reynolds v. Division of Aeronautics

August 24, 2009

ATRELLA R. REYNOLDS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THE DIVISION OF AERONAUTICS, A UNIT OF THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, SUSAN SHEA, TERRISSA LASHMETT, JAMES F. DEVEREUX, AND VICKIE STOUT, DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Murphy, District Judge

ORDER

Plaintiff, Atrella Reynolds, believes she is entitled to a default judgment against each defendant because they were served on July 13, 2009, and their response was due August 3, 2009.

Reynolds has not filed a return of service, so the Court has no way of knowing the exact date (or manner) of service. Nonetheless, Defendants have appeared through counsel and asked for more time to answer, and, on August 7, 2009, the Court extended the deadline for Defendants' response to August 26, 2009 (see Docs. 3, 4). For this reason, Defendants are not in default.

The motion for default judgment (Doc. 5) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

G. Patrick Murphy United States District Judge

20090824

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.