Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Cain v. Sherrod

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


August 6, 2009

HANSEL E. CAIN, PETITIONER,
v.
W.A. SHERROD, RESPONDENT.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is petitioner's "Request for Filing Charges," whereby he requests that charges be lodged against the Federal Bureau of Prisons for allegedly failing to accurately calculate petitioner's sentence and for maintaining inaccurate records. Petitioner explains that he presents this request to the Court because the U.S. Attorney's Office is opposing counsel in the above-captioned habeas corpus action cannot be trusted to police a fellow government agency. (Doc. 16).

The Court is powerless to assist petitioner. Public prosecutions are the prerogative of the Attorney General and United States Attorneys. See generally U.S. v. Nixon, 418 U.S. 683, 693 (1974); Confiscation Cases, 74 U.S. 454, 457 (1868). Moreover, the Attorney General and U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Illinois have historically demonstrated their willingness to prosecute wrongdoing within the executive branch, including the Department of Justice and its many agencies.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the subject motion (Doc. 16) is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20090806

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.