Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Courtright

July 27, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
v.
CARL A. COURTRIGHT III, DEFENDANT.



PRELIMINARY ORDER FOR FORFEITURE PURSUANT TO FED.R.CRIM.P. 32.2 WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN PROPERTY OF CARL A. COURTRIGHT, III

HERNDON, Chief Judge

In the Second Superseding Indictment filed in the above cause on February 18, 2009, the United States sought forfeiture of certain property. The Court, based upon the finding of guilt, hereby finds that the following property is forfeitable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 2253:

1. One HP Pavilion model number zd7000, serial number CNF4190C5H;

2. One HP Media Center PC serial number MXK6070RHZ;

3. One WESTERN DIGITAL hard drive serial number WCANU1320215;

4. One HP monitor serial number CNK602111Y;

5. One COMPAQ PRESARIO laptop serial number CNF61215KN;

6. One FUJITSU hard drive serial number NN3LT3B14J3J;

7. One TOSHIBA Satellite laptop serial number 17187183K; and

8. One FUJITSU hard drive serial number NZ0MT712571D.

The Court further finds the following property forfeitable pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 982(a)(2)(A):

1. Three Thousand One Hundred Dollars ($3,100.00) in United States currency, in that such sum represents proceeds received by the defendant as a result of the conduct charged in Count 4 of the Second Superseding Indictment.

A monetary forfeiture judgment is hereby entered for $3,100.00 in favor of the United States and against said defendant with respect to the $3,100.00 in United States currency as described above. The United States may, at its option, enforce this order as a forfeiture judgment with the ability to seek to forfeiture substitute assets; enforce this order as an ordinary monetary judgment in favor of the United States by any legal means; or enforce this order as a combination of the foregoing as long as the United States does not obtain double recovery in excess of the total amount of the judgment. The parties stipulate, and the Court finds, that as a result of the acts of the defendant, said $3,100.00 in United States currency cannot be located upon the exercise of due diligence, has been transferred or deposited with a third party, has been placed beyond the jurisdiction of the Court, and has been commingled with other property which cannot be divided without difficulty. The forfeiture of this sum of $3,100.00 is in addition to and separate from the forfeiture of the above-described computer equipment.

The United States shall, under the authority of 21 U.S.C. ยง 853(n)(1) to " publish notice of the order and of its intent to dispose of the property in such matter as the Attorney General may direct," provide notice of the forfeiture and the right of persons other than the defendant who have any claim or legal interest in any of the property to file a petition with the Court. Said notice shall be provided in a manner consisted with ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.