Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Ousley v. Cook County Cermak Health Services

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION


July 9, 2009

MALIK OUSLEY, SR. #20080035686, PLAINTIFF,
v.
COOK COUNTY CERMAK HEALTH SERVICES, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Milton I. Shadur Senior United States District Judge

MEMORANDUM ORDER

Malik Ousley, Sr. ("Ousley") has filed a self-prepared 42 U.S.C. §1983*fn1 Complaint against Cook County Cermak Health Services and a Dr. Halberg--"self-prepared" in the sense that Ousley has used the form of Complaint provided by this District Court's Clerk's Office for use by persons in custody, filling in the requested information in hand-printed form. Ousley has accompanied the Complaint with an In Forma Pauperis Application ("Application"), also using a Clerk's-Office-provided form, together with a hand-printed Application for Appointment of Counsel ("Counsel Application"). This sua sponte memorandum order dismisses both the Complaint and this action--though without prejudice--and accordingly denies the Application and Counsel Application as moot.

Because Ousley's grievance relates to "prison conditions" within the meaning of Section 1997e(a), Congress has established this precondition to his institution of this litigation:

No action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions under section 1983 of this title, or any other Federal law, by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted. But the Complaint is totally silent on that score, giving no indication that Ousley has (as Congress requires) either initiated or pursued any such administrative remedies.

As stated at the outset, then, Section 1997e(a) and 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b) mandate the dismissal of this action without prejudice. This Court would be remiss, however, if it failed to add the caution to Ousley that Section 1983 provides a remedy only for "deliberate indifference" as to an inmate's serious medical needs--a standard that does not encompass conduct that might instead be actionable as medical malpractice.*fn2


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.