Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Sales v. Urankar

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


July 7, 2009

ANDREW SALES, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JOHN URANKAR AND GATEWAY AUTOMOTIVE, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Andrew Sales's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Doc. 31). Sales does not need the Court's permission to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis because the Court determined at the trial level that he was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis. "A party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district-court action . . . may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization" unless the district court certifies or a statute provides otherwise. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). The Court has not and will not certify that Sales should not be allowed to continue as a pauper, and no statute forbids it. Therefore, Sales already has the authorization he needs, and the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 31) is DENIED as moot.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090707

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.