Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Shaheed v. Nalley

June 3, 2009

HAKEEM SHAHEED, PLAINTIFF,
v.
MICHAEL K. NALLEY, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Donald G. Wilkerson United States Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of HIPAA Protective Order (Doc. 86). Pursuant to SDIL-LR 7.1(g), Defendants had ten days in which to respond to Plaintiff's motion. That ten-day period has expired, and Defendants have not filed a response in opposition to the motion.*fn1

Rule 26 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure permits litigants to seek an order to protect discoverable, yet confidential, material from public disclosure. The parties stipulate that confidential information in this case will be used only for the purposes of this litigation, and that a protective order will secure protected information from unauthorized disclosure. The Court finds that good cause exists for issuance of an order permitting limited disclosure of such information, and that entry of the proposed protective order is appropriate pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26(c). The Court, being fully advised and having determined that good cause exists for entry of a protective order, GRANTS the motions.

THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND ORDERED:

A. The following words and terms are defined as follows for purposes of this Agreed Protective Order:

1. "Parties" shall mean the plaintiff and the defendants in this action and any additional party that this Court may subsequently recognize as subject to this protective order, and their attorneys.

2. "HIPAA" shall mean Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996, codified primarily at 18, 26 & 42 U.S.C. (2002).

3. "Privacy Standards" shall mean the Standards for Privacy of Individually Identifiable Health Information. See 45 C.F.R. §§ 160 & 164 (2000).

4. "PHI" shall mean Protected Health Information, as that term is used in HIPAA and the Privacy Standards. "PHI" includes, but is not limited to, health information, including demographic information, relating to either: (a) the past, present, or future physical or mental condition of an individual; (b) the provision of care to an individual; and/or c) the payment for care provided to an individual, which identifies the individual or which reasonably could be expected to identify the individual.

5. Further, this Order is intended by the parties to be applicable to, and to protect, any document or information already disclosed by any party which falls within the above definition of PHI.

B. This Order governs all discovery related to the exchange or dissemination of information or the production of documents designated as PHI.

1. The signatories shall be familiar with HIPAA and the Privacy Standards.

2. The signatories recognize that it may be necessary during the course of this proceeding to produce, disclose, receive, obtain, subpoena, and/or transmit PHI ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.