Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Terry v. Walker

June 3, 2009

MICHAEL TERRY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
ROGER WALKER, ET.AL., DEFENDANTS



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Harold A. Baker United States District Judge

MERIT REVIEW ORDER

This cause is before the court for merit review of the plaintiff's complaint. The court is required by 28 U.S.C. §1915A to "screen" the plaintiff's complaint, and through such process to identify and dismiss any legally insufficient claim, or the entire action if warranted. A claim is legally insufficient if it "(1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief."

28 U.S.C. §1915A.

The plaintiff, Michael Terry, has filed his lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 claiming that his constitutional rights were violated. The plaintiff has named six defendants including Illinois Department of Corrections Director Roger Walker, Warden Stephen Wright, Warden Acevado, Head Counselor Jeff Sutor, Administrative Review Board Member Sherry Benton and Record Officer Supervisor Amy Eldert.

The plaintiff says he is asking for damages because he says his sentence has not been correctly computed. The plaintiff says he arrested and charged in two different criminal cases in Champaign County. He was arrested on April 10, 2005 in Case No. 5 CF 660, Felony Retail Theft and he was arrested on May 12, 2005 in Case No. 05 CF 918 Theft (Prior Theft Conviction). The plaintiff was sentenced in Case No. 5 CF 660 to three years with credit for 81 days to be served consecutive to two years with credit for 70 days in Case No. 5 CF 918.

The plaintiff says he should have been given credit then for 151 days in custody, but instead received credit for only 71 days. The plaintiff has attached a variety of documents to his complaint with belie his claim. Beam v. IPCO Corp., 838 F.2d 242, 244 (7th Cir.1988) (stating that exhibits attached to the complaint are incorporated into the pleading for purposes of Rule 12(b) motions). The court is "not obliged to ignore any facts set forth in the complaint that undermine the plaintiff's claim..." R.J.R. Serv., Inc. v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 895 F.2d 279, 281 (7th Cir.1989).

A January 10, 2007, letter from Casework Supervisor Sutor states that the records form the Champaign County Jail indicate the following:

*The plaintiff was in custody form April 10, 2005 to April 11, 2005 in Case No. 5 CF 660.

* The plaintiff was in custody from May 12, 2005 to July 20, 2005 in Case No. 5 CF 918.

* The plaintiff returned to custody in both cases on November 6, 2005 until he was transferred to the Department of Corrections.

"The time from 11-6-05 to the date you entered IDOC cannot be credited against each case separately as this would result in the time being give to you twice." (Comp, Ex. I) Assistant Champaign County States Attorney Julia Reitz explains that when "consecutive sentences are imposed, the defendant is only to receive credit once ...for the actual time served." (Comp, Ex D., p. 1).

The plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1915A.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED:

1) The plaintiff's complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12(b)(6) and 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A. This case is closed, ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.