IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
May 14, 2009
RICHARD B. KELLY, PLAINTIFF,
JACOB NULL, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge
Before the Court is plaintiff's "Motion to Compell a Discovery Response to Admits Fully" [sic]. (Doc. 67). The Court construes the motion as relating to the sufficiency of the defendants' answers and/or objections to plaintiff's requests for admission, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 36(a).
A review of the record reveals two separate requests for admission; one directed to defendants Powers and Caliper, and the other directed to defendants Null, Sisk, Branch and Osman. (Docs. 30 and 31). Plaintiff has not attached copies of the requests for admission and/or responses at issue, or otherwise specified which defendants and which requests are at issue. Therefore, it is impossible for the Court to analyze the propriety of the defendants' responses.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the subject motion (Doc. 67) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.