IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
January 27, 2009
STAVENA AKINS-BRAKEFIELD, PLAINTIFF,
PHILP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Herndon, Chief Judge
Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Doc. 28), to which Defendant has filed an opposing Response (Doc. 30). Plaintiff seeks a stay pending a ruling on her Rule 60(b) Motion in Case No. 08-438 (the "First Case"). Plaintiff seeks to reopen and reinstate the First Case, which she feels is essentially the same case as the instant matter and also seeks to consolidate both cases.
However, from the Status Report (Doc. 29), filed by Plaintiff, it appears that Plaintiff's Rule 60(b) Motion and her Motion to Consolidate were denied in the First Case. Thus, there is no longer a need for a stay in this matter. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion to Stay (Doc. 28) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
David R Herndon Chief Judge United States District Court
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.