Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

United States v. Torres-Rodriguez

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


January 23, 2009

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF,
v.
HERIBERTO TORRES-RODRIGUEZ, DEFENDANT

The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert U.S. District Judge

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

THIS MATTER is before the Court on defendant Torres-Rodriguez's motions for discovery and inspection regarding confidential informants (Doc. 24), for production of interviewing protocols (Doc. 28) and for notice of "other crimes, wrongs or acts" evidence (Doc. 29).

I. Discovery Motions

As a preliminary matter, the Court notes that there is no general constitutional right to discovery in a criminal case. Weatherford v. Bursey, 429 U.S. 545, 559 (1977); see Gray v. Netherland, 518 U.S. 152, 168 (1996). However, Rule 16 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure and constitutional due process regarding exculpatory material allow criminal defendants limited access to information regarding the government's case.

The Court's Order for Pre-Trial Discovery and Inspection (Doc. 12) instructs the parties to attempt to resolve discovery disputes without recourse to the Court. If the parties have tried to resolve their disputes and have been unable to do so, the Court allows them to file a motion for discovery and a brief in support of the motion within 28 days of the arraignment. Any motion filed with the Court must contain a statement that a discovery conference was held and that agreement could not be reached concerning the discovery or inspection that is the subject of the motion. The defendant has not complied with this order; he failed to include the statements required regarding attempts to resolve discovery disputes without recourse to the Court. For this reason, the Court DENIES the motions (Docs. 24 & 28) without prejudice to their refiling should extra-judicial discussions fail to resolve the discovery issues.

II. Notice of Government's Intent to Use Evidence of Other Crimes, Wrongs, or Acts

The defendant seeks an order directing the government to give notice of its intention to use evidence of similar crimes, wrongs or acts pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 404(b). Rule 404(b) provides that the prosecution in a criminal case shall provide reasonable notice in advance of trial of the general nature of any evidence of other crimes, wrongs or acts allegedly committed by the defendant that the government intends to introduce at trial. Therefore, the Court GRANTS the defendant's motion (Doc. 29) and ORDERS the government to give the defendant notice of the intent to use such evidence, which shall include a description of the general nature of the evidence, no later than one week before trial.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20090123

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.