IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
January 9, 2009
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, EX REL. PAM TUCKER, PLAINTIFF(S),
P.D.L. NAYAK, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge
Before the Court is defendant Nayak's motion to compel relator Tucker to respond to interrogatories and requests for production propounded on or about September 29, 2008. (Doc. 55). Relator Tucker did not respond to defendant's discovery requests, and no motion for an extension of time was ever filed with the Court. Relator Tucker has never responded to the subject motion to compel.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that defendant Nayak's motion to compel (Doc. 55) is GRANTED. Having waived all objections to the discovery requests, on or before January 15, 2009, relator Tucker shall respond and/or comply with each request, without objection, if relator has not already done so.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.