Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Zelasco v. Comerio

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


December 22, 2008

SANDRA ZELASCO, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RODOLFO COMERIO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the court is Defendant Harburg-Freudenberger Maschinenbau GmbHs' Motion to Compel Discovery Responses. (Doc. 51).

Plaintiff has not responded to the Motion, and the time for doing so has now expired. The failure to respond is considered to be an admission of the merits of the motions, pursuant to SDIL-LR 7.1(g).

Notwithstanding plaintiff's failure to respond, the court has reviewed her objections to defendant's interrogatories, and finds that they are without merit. Plaintiff's deposition is scheduled for December 30, 2008. Defendant is entitled to receive her answers in sufficient time to permit counsel to review them before the deposition.

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, Defendant Harburg-Freudenberger Maschinenbau GmbHs' Motion to Compel Discovery Responses (Doc. 51) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to serve full and complete answers to defendant's interrogatories numbered 9, 10, 11, 21 and 22 before 12:00 p.m. on December 29, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20081222

© 1992-2009 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.