Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Putman v. Lima Auto Mall

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


December 10, 2008

ALVIN PUTMAN, PLAINTIFF,
v.
LIMA AUTO MALL, INC., ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the Court is plaintiff Putman's motion for reconsideration of the Court's Order dated December 8, 2008, quashing subpoenas issued to Ken Otey and Craig Gottfried, employees of former defendant Airtex Products. L.P. (Doc. 8). Plaintiff had difficulty with the District's electronic filing requirements, which caused the Court to issue its ruling without the benefit of plaintiff's response.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, for good cause shown, plaintiff's motion for reconsideration (Doc. 8) is GRANTED; the Court will reconsider its Order quashing the subpoenas issued to Ken Otey and Craig Gottfried (Doc. 5).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any reply to plaintiff's response must be filed on or before December 23, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20081210

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.