Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Iowa Health System, Inc. v. Graham

July 30, 2008

IOWA HEALTH SYSTEM, INC., PLAINTIFF,
v.
SALLI GRAHAM, TRUSTEE OF DUNCAN GRAHAM, DEFENDANT.



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Joe Billy McDade United States District Judge

OPINION AND ORDER

Before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6). Plaintiff filed a Response (Doc. 9). For the following reasons, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Iowa Health System, Inc. ("Iowa Health") is a fiduciary of a self-funded employee benefit medical plan ("IH Plan") that is governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA").*fn1 Defendant Salli Graham was a participant in the IH Plan. She also is the trustee and guardian of minor, Duncan Graham, who received benefits under the IH Plan.

On April 9, 2004, Duncan Graham sustained physical injuries during a motor vehicle accident and was compensated $21,587.06 by Principal Life Insurance under the IH Plan. However, the IH Plan contains an express provision requiring participants to fully reimburse the IH Plan for benefits received from other insurers as a result of injuries caused by third parties. (Doc. 1-3.) Dennis and Salli Graham filed a negligence claim on behalf of Duncan Graham for his injuries. The claim resulted in a $50,000 settlement from a third-party liability policy and an underinsured motorist policy in October 2004. The Circuit Court of Rock Island ordered Dennis and Salli Graham, as guardians of Duncan Graham's estate, to deposit the remaining $37,498.42 of the settlement (after attorney and other fees) in the Mississippi Valley Credit Union in East Moline, Illinois. See (Doc. 6 at 25.)

Dennis and Salli Graham then filed an Application to Adjudicate Liens on behalf of Duncan Graham in the Circuit Court of Rock Island and served summons on Principal Life Insurance Company, which had originally compensated Duncan Graham pursuant to the IH plan. (Doc. 6 at 1, 2.) Principal Life Insurance failed to file a responsive pleading so Dennis and Salli Graham filed a Motion for Default in August 2005. After Principal Life Insurance failed to enter an appearance, the Circuit Court of Rock Island entered an Order of Default, which Principal Life Insurance never contested.

On June 20, 2007, Iowa Health brought the present claim against Defendant Salli Graham, as trustee of Duncan Graham, for equitable relief to enforce the terms and preserve the assets of the IH Plan under ERISA. (Doc. 1.) Iowa Health asserts it is authorized to bring this ERISA action on behalf of the other IH Plan participants, including Principal Life Insurance, under 29 U.S.C. § 1332(a)(3).*fn2

In the Complaint, Iowa Health argues Defendant actually or constructively possesses Duncan Graham's settlement proceeds and failed to reimburse the IH Plan from those proceeds. In response, Defendant brought the instant Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 6) and argues that: (1) Plaintiff is barred from pursuing this matter under the doctrine of res judicata; (2) Plaintiff is not entitled to subrogation against a minor's recovery in a personal injury claim; and (3) Defendant does not have Duncan Graham's funds within her possession or control.

LEGAL STANDARD

To survive a Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal, the Seventh Circuit has established that a plaintiff need only satisfy the "short and plain statement" requirement of Rule 8 by asserting mere claims in the complaint without having to plead facts or legal theories. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a); Vincent v. City Colleges of Chicago, 485 F.3d 919, 923 (7th Cir. 2007). This "notice pleading" standard merely requires a plaintiff to provide enough detail to give a defendant fair notice of what the claim is, its grounds, and show that his entitlement to relief is plausible, rather than merely speculative. Tamayo v. Blagojevich, 526 F.3d 1074, 1083 (7th Cir. 2008).

DISCUSSION

1. Applicability of Res Judicata

Defendant argues that Iowa Health's claim is barred under the doctrine of res judicata because the Circuit Court of Rock Island entered an Order of Default against Principal Life Insurance for failing to appear and or plead in the lien adjudication claim filed on behalf of Duncan Graham.*fn3 In analyzing Defendant's res judicata claim, this Court shall apply the preclusion law of Illinois, because the Circuit Court of Rock Island rendered the initial default judgment. Whitaker v. Ameritech Corp., 129 F.3d 952, 955 (7th Cir. 1997). Under Illinois law, the party invoking res judicata has the burden of showing extrinsic evidence that the precise point involved in the current suit was, or should have been raised, in a previous suit. Torcasso v. Standard Outdoor Sales, Inc., 157 Ill. 2d 484, 491 (1993). Therefore, Defendant must show: (1) a final judgment on the merits rendered by a court with jurisdiction; (2) an identity of cause of actions exists; and (3) the parties or privies are identical in both actions. Rein v. David A. Noyes & Co., 172 Ill. 2d 325, 335 (1996).

Defendant's argument fails because Iowa Health was unable to bring the present ERISA claim before the Circuit Court of Rock Island and did not have the opportunity to choose a federal forum. See Spitz v. Tepfer, 171 F.3d 443, 447 (7th Cir. 1999) (res judicata not proper when a party's claim falls under exclusive ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.