Not what you're
looking for? Try an advanced search.
Yureck v. McBride
April 16, 2008
STANLEY L. YURECK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
RONALD E. MCBRIDE, AND R & R EXPRESS, DEFENDANTS/THIRD PARTY PLAINTIFFS,
v.
BESL TRANSFER COMPANY, THIRD PARTY DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge
Before the court is Defendants' Motion to Compel Directed to Plaintiff. (Doc. 55). Plaintiff has not responded, and the time for doing so has expired. The court deems the failure to respond to be an admission of the merits of the motion. SDIL-LR 7.1(g).
Upon consideration and for good cause shown, Defendants' Motion to Compel Directed to Plaintiff (Doc. 55) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff is ordered to fully answer defendants' Interrogatory Number 20; supplement his Rule 26 disclosures by itemizing his medical damages and stating the amount of the medical bills which he relates to the accident; and sign the authorization requested in defendants' Second Request for Production. Plaintiff shall comply by April 24, 2008.
CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw ...