Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Clark v. United States

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


March 28, 2008

SCOTTER CLARK, PLAINTIFF,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Stiehl, District Judge

ORDER

This matter is before the Court for docket control. The Court notes that its order (Doc. 80) granting defendant United States' motion for reconsideration (Doc. 72) improperly omitted defendant Phillip Long from the list of defendants against which plaintiff's retaliation claim is still pending. Accordingly, the Court, sua sponte, amends its memorandum and order of March 26, 2008 (Doc. 80) as follows:

The Court GRANTS defendant United States of America's motion for reconsideration and DISMISSES Count I of plaintiff's complaint as to the United States. Harper v. Virginia Dep't. of Taxation, 509 U.S. 86, 97 (1993). The Court, sua sponte, DISMISSES Count I as to defendant Thomas/Jansen. Plaintiff's Bivens retaliation claim in Count II against defendants Sonja Carney, Kurt Nuedeck, S. Thomas/Jansen, Amber Nelson, Stu Solmomson, and Phillip Long is the only claim remaining.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

WILLIAM D. STIEHL District Judge

20080328

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.