IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
March 10, 2008
JOSE RAMIREZ, PLAINTIFF,
HARRELL WATTS, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge
Before the Court is plaintiff Ramirez's motion to compel the defendants to fully respond to a request for production propounded on or about March 16, 2007, and interrogatories directed to defendant Cross propounded on or about April 4, 2007. (Doc. 88). According to plaintiff, he not received any response to his discovery requests. The defendants respond that all of the discovery requests have been answered. (Doc. 89). Plaintiff did not file a reply; therefore the Court perceives that plaintiff's motion is now moot in all respects.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff's motion to compel (Doc. 88) is DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
CLIFFORD J. PROUD U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.