Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Williams v. Schram

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS


March 5, 2008

CARL E. WILLIAMS, PLAINTIFF,
v.
THOMAS M. SCHRAM, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.

The opinion of the court was delivered by: Proud, Magistrate Judge

ORDER

Before the court is plaintiff's Motion to Compel, or, in the Alternative, Request for Leave to Serve Interrogatories and Production Requests. (Doc. 84).

Plaintiff served his third supplemental interrogatories and production requests on December 21, 2007. These discovery requests related to punitive damages, which only became an issue when plaintiff filed his amended complaint on November 29, 2007. Defendants declined to answer because the discovery deadline had passed.

Defendants have not responded to the motion, and the time for doing so has now expired. The court deems the failure to respond to be an admission of the merits of the motion. SDIL-LR 7.1

Upon consideration and for good cause shown, plaintiff's Motion to Compel, or, in the Alternative, Request for Leave to Serve Interrogatories and Production Requests (Doc. 84) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted leave to serve his third supplemental interrogatories and production requests. Plaintiff need not physically serve the discovery requests again. Defendants shall respond to the discovery requests by March 26, 2008.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

CLIFFORD J. PROUD UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20080305

© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.



Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Official citation and/or docket number and footnotes (if any) for this case available with purchase.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.