UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
February 11, 2008
OILY H. THOMAS, PETER GUZMAN, JAMES ARMSTRONG AND BRIAN SMITH, PLAINTIFFS,
ROGER E. WALKER, JR., SALVADOR GODINEZ, SHELTON FRYE, RUANN TANNER AND OFFICER DELGADO, DEFENDANTS.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: J. Phil Gilbert District Judge
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on plaintiff Oily Thomas's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 75). A federal court may permit a party to proceed on appeal without full pre-payment of fees provided the party is indigent and the appeal is taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). A frivolous appeal cannot be made in good faith. Lee v. Clinton, 209 F.3d 1025, 1026-27 (7th Cir. 2000). The test for determining if an appeal is in good faith or not frivolous is whether any of the legal points are reasonably arguable on their merits. Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989) (citing Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)); Walker v. O'Brien, 216 F.3d 626, 632 (7th Cir. 2000).
With his petition for leave to appeal in forma pauperis, Thomas failed to include a certified copy of his trust fund account statement or institutional equivalent for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing of the notice of appeal as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2) or to set forth a claim of entitlement to redress and the issues that he intends to present on appeal as required by Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1). On November 16, 2007, the Court ordered Thomas to submit these items on or before December 14, 2007, and warned Thomas that the Court could deny his motion if he failed to submit the required information. Thomas has submitted nothing. Without the required information the Court cannot say that Thomas is indigent or that his appeal is in good faith. Therefore, the Court DENIES Thomas's motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis (Doc. 75) and CERTIFIES that this appeal is not taken in good faith.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.