IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS
January 23, 2008
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF,
LEAMON A. HATFIELD, DEFENDANT.
The opinion of the court was delivered by: Reagan, District Judge
On January 15, 2008, the Court entered an Order denying Hatfield's motion for new trial (Doc. 113). The Court recently discovered that the Order contains three clerical errors.
First, in the second full paragraph on page three, the Order states that Officer Cutshaw "recovered wire cutters and prescription pill bottles from the, and found a police scanner nearby." The Order should state that Officer Cutshaw "recovered wire cutters and prescription pill bottles from them, and found a police scanner nearby."
Second, in the last line on page five, the Order states that Mr. Garrison "acknowledge the need to issue a curative instruction." The Order should state that Mr. Garrison "acknowledged the need to issue a curative instruction."
Finally, in the second full paragraph on page fifteen, the Order states that Hatfield argued that if the Government provided more information, "he may have been able to establish a public authority offense." The Order should state, "he may have been able to establish a public authority defense."
FEDERAL RULE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE 36 provides: "After giving any notice it considers appropriate, the court may at any time correct a clerical error in a judgment, order, or other part of the record, or correct an error in the record arising from oversight or omission."
Accordingly, the Court hereby VACATES its January 15, 2008 Order (Doc. 113) and will issue an Order that corrects these errors.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
MICHAEL J. REAGAN United States District Judge
© 1992-2008 VersusLaw Inc.